top of page

Updated: Jan 16, 2023

Want to know a foolproof way to get funding for your optimization projects?


Ya sorry, there is no foolproof way. HOWEVER I find that a successful approach is to propose several layers of changes with differing goals, and attach ROI to each and productivity rates.


Take time to frame your optimization proposal in terms of short and long term gains. Take into consideration the entire gamut of advantages including increased productivity, performance and revenue, lowered costs, improved employee and customer satisfaction, industry goodwill, competitive advantage, reduced turnaround time, diversification and risk mitigation, and much more.


Consider your audience - the head of the union wants to know if these changes are going to cost jobs or if you are building in programs to re-train employees which may actually fuel some opportunities to reward high performers and motivate underperformers. The CFO wants to know timelines in terms of budget and ROI. The plant manager wants to understand how much productivity will increase because that is how he personally is measured in his job. There is a whole new role as well, the VP of Sustainability is looking for the environmental advantages of optimization and the more clear you can be with those numbers (how many tonnes of CO2 will not be produced), the better.


Optimization projects often have a ripple effect. Be sure to mention how it will benefit safety, employee training and upcycling, product line diversification and increased output as well as cost cutting methods.


Be prepared for competing requirements. We all know that companies should be continuously looking to measure and improve efficiency. They should invest in technology and infrastructure on an ongoing basis but the reality is that these are often railroaded for more “urgent” tasks, repairs that can’t wait, a new warehouse to add capacity, that sort of thing. So sometimes you need a workaround.


There is another way....

There are all sorts of funding opportunities around energy rebates.

Get Funding

  • Energy Rebates - have been known to fund 50% of steam trap monitoring projects including covering steam trap inspection as well as steam trap monitoring equipment and defective trap replacement or repair in parts of Canada and US.

  • Green Technology Retrofit Rebates - Ontario and other governments have committed billions of dollars to modify and enhance factories and industrial businesses to work toward ‘net zero carbon’ status

  • Large Volume Program - for companies use a large portion of their green budget for one single project (particularly if they have multiple sites all participating)

  • IESO Conservation Fund - for businesses who are reducing their electric energy use

  • Natural Gas Demand Side Management - another government fund available to businesses who are able to reduce their need for natural gas

  • US DOE -free energy audits, rebates for efficient heating systems, reduced costs for efficient technology solutions

  • National Grid - enhanced steam trap incentive

  • Many, many more - incentive and rebate programs are available through local and federal programs.


I personally find that optimization is its own reward. The satisfaction I get from improving processes is extreme. I also am a proponent of making continuous small updates all the time. Waiting until the situation is critical and requires extremely aggressive timelines and carries a high risk is less than ideal. There is no easy and foolproof way to get funding for your next optimization project but there definitely are some approaches that work better than others.


Updated: Jan 16, 2023

Recent studies have shown that corporations that are truly guided by ESG issues have increased returns by 2-6%!


Many institutions had an ESG mandate which was more of a greenwashing “nice idea” kind of statement than a real focus for their investment and vendor choices. Not only are governments around the world introducing new regulations that will require transparency and accountability in all industries, but it is now proven that organizations that invest in ESG options are reducing their risk and increasing revenue across the board. One way it reduces risk is by diversifying their dependencies on technology, fuel, and commodity sources so they are able to adapt more quickly to industry, regulatory and market shifts. They are no longer the pawns in political or marketplace maneuvering and can also push the buttons on ethical and sustainable sourcing.

A recent global survey was conducted around buying behaviour and sustainability. 85% of people indicate they have shifted their purchase behaviour in the last 5 years. More than a third of global consumers are willing to pay more for sustainable products.


As well, as companies worldwide get closer and closer to their Net Zero deadlines, everyone is scrambling to find new sources of heat (check out my other blog Steam is so Cool to learn about supercritical solar powered steam). While biofuels and wind power feel very innovative, we can’t forget the tried and tested steam. Steam heat has been around since 1745. Steam heat systems are extremely durable, it is efficient, and low cost (while hydrogen for example is projected to cost twice to three and a half times as much as current heating systems).



In a recent EY DNA of the CFO survey it was found that 74% of finance leaders say that investors increasingly use nonfinancial information in their decision-making.

Therefore corporations are measuring CFOs on financial metrics as well as ESG metrics. So the CFOs have a very powerful, very personal reason to implement these standards. This trickles down to their hiring practices, where they will hire people based on agility to respond to changing market disruptions, emotional intelligence and long term vision.


In reality, ESG soon will be table stakes, and corporations will be judged not only on their internal policies and sustainability and diversity position but by who they buy from, partner with and even sell to. The sooner these corporations “clean” up their entire supply chain the more leverage they will have to grab market share in advance of the laggards.




The key to achieving Net Zero will be finding new ways to heat and power industrial processes


What is Heat Decarbonization? The decarbonization of heat refers to reducing the amount of carbon produced by heating systems. This involves switching to low carbon heating systems in order to provide homes and businesses with 'clean' heat to meet NetZero goals. Fuel options being studied to produce electricity include solar, biofuels, wind, waves, rain, nuclear, tidal, geothermal and more. Using electricity created by a low carbon source to heat steam, to heat buildings, and power mechanical processes or sterilize instruments means that the entire system is clean and green.


Recent studies have shown that in most markets reaching 50 to 60% decarbonization of the power system can be achieved easily by 2040. Reaching 80 to 90% by 2040 would be much more difficult and the last 10% would be a significant investment in time and money. Although 50-60% obviously would be a huge improvement, it is not enough. The UK has committed to Net Zero carbon for heat by 2050. Only by creating and supporting those types of stretch goals will we stand a chance to change enough to make a real difference and only if all stakeholders participate.


In order to make energy and heat decarbonization a reality there need to be many changes at many levels
  • Organizations (including developers and investors of future businesses) need to incorporate this into their thinking and planning right away. It is in their best interest from a financial perspective now (many so-called alternative fuel sources have come way down in price) and in the future (when regulatory requirements will require them to transition anyway).

  • Politicians need to create realistic, easy to understand regulations and incentives for organizations to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels. It has to be a carrot and stick approach and it’s not going to be popular with everyone. We need government to stick to their guns and put the future of the planet first.

  • Innovators need to continue to push themselves to find new ways or improve current alternatives to overcome the hurdles to adoption. Make retrofit projects and green energy more convenient and less costly both at inception and in the long term (no one wants landfills full of batteries and toxic solar panels either).

The US Department of Energy has put together an “Industrial Decarbonization Roadmap” and believes it is critical to labour and equity goals and American administration has pledged that 40% of overall benefits will be delivered to disadvantaged communities. Energy efficiency is a foundational, crosscutting decarbonization strategy and is the most cost-effective option for GHG emission reductions in the near term. In addition, electricity generation is the single biggest contributor to climate change, responsible for 30% of all greenhouse emissions. Carbon-free energy certainly promises a myriad of benefits. It is necessary for us to explore multiple sources though. Green energy is notoriously unreliable, what do solar powered processes do on cloudy days? And wind power on still days? Plus biofuel, hydrogen, and nuclear all have their drawbacks.


The impetus will continue to be on the government to fund the heat decarbonization research and development and regulate the use of these alternative fuel sources, all of which can create steam which is and always has been an extraordinarily clean and powerful renewable energy.




bottom of page